“Risky Business”: a critical analysis of the role of crisis resolution and home treatment teams

BACKGROUND In 2000, the Department of Health for England recommended the creation of crisis resolution and home treatment teams (CRHTs) in order to reduce the number and length of psychiatric hospital admissions. Central to this was the role of gate-keeping all potential admissions. AIM To examine the interface between crisis resolution and home treatment and other mental health services. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with mental health professionals (n = 25) at eight sites within one Strategic Health Authority region. RESULTS Despite wide variation in approach and provision, all teams were confronting common issues related to tensions at both ends of the service user trajectory - on initial assessment and on discharge. CONCLUSION The CRHT model is likely to be most effective when there is low staff turnover, flexibility in inter-team working arrangements and senior practitioners have both acute and community experience. Rather than being seen primarily as gatekeeper to the acute service, it would be better to take a system approach and view the CRHT as a resource for clients awaiting discharge or seeking to avoid hospital admission that is equally available to both acute and community services.